![]() Review Editors are selected by the Federal Steering Committee from a pool of experts, including those generated through a public nomination process.Technical Contributors may be selected from the pool of publicly nominated authors. They are selected on an as-needed basis, for specific needs identified by the author team. Technical Contributors provide limited, requested inputs into chapter development.Chapter author teams work with Chapter Leads to develop draft chapters and edit those materials in response to comments received during the multiple rounds of review. They are responsible for developing chapter content. Chapter Authors are selected by the Chapter Leads in consultation with the Federal Coordinating Lead Author and Federal Steering Committee, based in part on nominations via the public call.Chapters are submitted to the corresponding Federal Coordinating Lead Author, and ultimately transmitted to the Federal Steering Committee as the individual input of the Chapter Leads. Chapter Author teams are established by the Chapter Leads with suggestions from the Federal Coordinating Lead Authors and the Federal Steering Committee. In consultation with Federal Coordinating Lead Authors, Chapter Leads organize, direct, and lead authorship of individual chapters. Chapter Leads are federal or non-federal experts selected from a pool generated in part by a public nominations process.Federal Coordinating Lead Authors and Agency Chapter Leads work across chapters to ensure consistency throughout the report and adherence to development guidance. Coordinating Lead Authors are also the points of contact to the Chapter Leads.The Federal Steering Committee (with concurrence from the SGCR) selects Federal Coordinating Lead Authors, Chapter Leads, and Review Editors based on a number of criteria, including scientific expertise and experience with scientific assessments. A Federal Steering Committee is responsible for the development, production, and content of the report as well as high-level scoping to ensure coherence, relevance, and responsiveness to the Global Change Research Act and the USGCRP Strategic Plan.NCA5 Participant Roles and Responsibilities NCA5 will assess current and future risks posed by climate change to each of NCA’s 10 regions, illustrated below. This approach is designed to result in a report that is authoritative, timely, relevant, and policy neutral valued by authors and users accessible to the widest possible audience and fully compliant with the GCRA and other applicable laws and policies. As in previous assessments, NCA5 will undergo an extensive, multi-phase process of internal and external review from federal agency experts, the general public, and external peer review by a panel of experts established by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. The process is designed to be transparent and inclusive, offering multiple opportunities for public participation. NOAA, as the administrative agency for NCA5, is responsible for establishing procedures for the report, releasing Federal Register Notices, and certifying the report meets Information Quality Act and Evidence Act standards. The development of NCA5 is overseen by a Federal Steering Committee appointed by the Subcommittee on Global Change Research (SGCR) and comprising representatives from USGCRP agencies. The Fifth National Climate Assessment (NCA5), currently in development, will analyze the impacts of global change in the United States.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |